Performance Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
This internet guide is based on: Human Resource Management in a Business Context
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Introduction
Overview of HRM Guide |
| HRM Guide Updates
Latest updates on the HRM Guide websites |
| Jobs and Careers
Advice, job postings and leads |
| HRM Topics
Hundreds of pages of information, updates and links to articles |
| HR Directory
Links to HR service providers |
| HR News Releases
Announcements, news, reports |
This section considers how employee performance can be evaluated and fostered. Assessment and reward strategies are related to concepts of effective working behaviour.
The business environment exercises both a direct and an indirect influence on the conduct of performance assessment. Whereas legislation has specific consequences, particularly in the USA, most environmental factors have a diffuse and often unrealized effect on assessment and pay structures. More
Cultural norms dictate 'acceptable' standards of performance and the management methods by which they are assured. More
Performance measurement has become a sensitive legal issue in the USA because of possible consequences on equal opportunities. More
At times of high unemployment, workers are thought to be concerned about losing their jobs and hence more conscientious and tolerant of strict management. When suitable employees are scarce, managers must be cautious - unflattering assessments can trigger an employee's move to another organization. More
Considerable variation is found between industry sectors due to the nature of work involved, tradition and fashion. In some cases objectives are particularly difficult to measure. More
Developments in IT are leading to significant changes in the measurement of performance. Extensive statistics can be generated but how meaningful are they? More
In the 1980s and early 90s, the nature of employment relationships in capitalist countries changed, moving the balance of power firmly in favour of employers. Performance assessment became the crucial means of monitoring this relationship. Job descriptions disappeared or were diluted, so that employees could be asked to do virtually anything required by the organisation. Conversely, performance criteria were more tightly defined, typically expressed in the form of demanding objectives: forever-moving goalposts. Job descriptions are becoming looser but performance objectives are expected to be specific and demanding. What are the consequences? More
Performance-related pay schemes emphasise the individual (or possibly teams), reducing the role and influence of trade unions. More
What happens when white, male supervisors assess the performance of women or members of ethnic minorities? More
|
HRM
Guide
.net
Human Resources |
|
|
|
| Copyright © 1997-2007 Alan Price and HRM Guide contributors contributors. All rights reserved. |