Recruiting Practices and Employer Branding
Updated December 13 2011 - Recruiting practices need to be consistent with branding strategies or organizations risk missing out on top talent and potential
revenue, according to a global study by Alexander Mann Solutions - and social media amplify the consequences..
The study surveyed 546 consumers in the USA, UK and China and found that 52% of
respondents said that negative experiences at recruitment interviews would affect their future purchasing decisions. 47% of Chinese respondents
said that they would reconsider buying from an organization after a bad interview experience compared to 50% of American respondents and 58% in the
United Kingdom. There has always been a risk of people rejected by the recruitment process spreading negative opinions but social media such as
Facebook and Twitter can now provide them with a means of influencing hundreds or thousands of people. Three quarters of American respondents
said they would be likely to share their negative interview experience with friends and contacts.
Lisa Chartier, head of U.S. resourcing communications for Alexander Mann Solutions said:
"There’s a crucial 'sliding door' moment for interviewing candidates. Not only are they potential customers, but during the interviewing process,
they also have the potential to become part of the brand. Companies that don’t consider the implications of this very emotional process are - at best -
letting a potential customer go. At worst, these companies are damaging their brands on a much larger scale."
The significant investments businesses make in building their brands can be damaged by unthinking human resource actions
that result in negative actions from disgruntled job candidates and former employees. Organizations should have safeguards in place
to avoid unsatisfactory human resources experience. The report recommends that branding strategies should apply throughout the complete employment
lifecycle - 'from interviewing candidates to transitioning employees to alumni.' The report states that organizations often overlook the final stage
of the employee lifecycle, but ex-employees continue their relationship with brands as:
- potential customers
- product advocates
- possible future recruits
According to Lisa Chartier:
"There are three primary phases within the full employment lifecycle - the candidate touch point, the employee touch point, and the alumni
touch point - each with several touch point opportunities for engagement within them. Each of these touch points is vital in ensuring that
an employee, or potential employee, has a positive brand experience that they are likely to carry forward with them."
Perhaps surprisingly, 88% of American respondents seemed not to mind if prospective employers checked their profiles on social media
(including Facebook and Twitter) as part of a recruitment process. Job applicants are often told to keep their social media pages
hidden from potential employers, but apparently most Americans expect their online lives to add weight to hiring decisions. Just over a half
(50.3%) felt that it would not make a difference to their view of an organization if their social media profiles were looked at during the
recruitment process and 29.7% said that it would have a positive impact on the their view of that company.
Lisa Chartier said:
"The tide has turned on the way job candidates use social media. In today’s world, consumers are regularly engaging with brands on Facebook and
Twitter, so it’s natural for this interaction to extend into the job application sphere. While some brands have been slow to use
these channels to support their employer brands and talent management strategies, these findings should open the door for them to confidently move
in this direction. In general, taking a more thoughtful and strategic approach to the entire interview process will lead to a longer, more
rewarding relationship between the candidate and the employer - no matter the outcome of the interviewing process."
myStaffingPro recently co-sponsored a Ventana Research study,
Social Media in Recruiting: Using New Channels to Source Talent,
on organizations' attitudes towards social media and recruiting processes and technology. According to this benchmark study, by mid-2012, organizations expect to be using social media to source 82% of the types of jobs inquired about,
including finance and administration roles, front office, IT, line-of-business operations and education or learning functions. This represents
a 14% increase on current levels of sourcing. The study also shows that although social recruiting is an emerging trend, only 15%
of respondents were satisfied with their present efforts in social recruiting.
Bob Schulte, president and chief executive officer of myStaffingPro, said that as strong proponents of social media, they were "pleased to have a study that clarifies the trends and best practices in organizations’
use of social media in recruiting and talent management." He concluded: "The research is clear: social media is here to stay. Smart companies will apply the methodologies from the benchmark study and implement
them for their company."
The effects and implications of 'employer branding' have interested both
HR theorists and corporate branding experts for some time.
In Taking Brand Initiative: How Companies Can Align Strategy,
Culture, and Identity Through Corporate Branding, Mary Jo Hatch and Majken Schultz (p.33) state:
"... BMW, Apple and Google have all created brands that make it easier for these companies
to recruit talented workers and to motivate their employees. These effects get into territory that is highly
subjective, such as the emotional attractions of a workplace or a brand's motivational implications. This
territory lies beyond the reach of ordinary economic analysis."
According to Alan Price Human Resource Management, 4th edition:
"The basis of employer branding is the application of the same marketing and
branding practices to a company's human resource activities (specifically, recruitment and
retention) as it uses for consumer-targeted marketing and branding efforts. In other words, the business
markets its brand image to its staff. And just as customers will cease buying a company's products
or services when a promise is unfulfilled, its employees will also leave if the company fails to live up to its employer brand promises."
Some businesses use separate, dedicated employer branding efforts aimed at aligning
employees with their organizations' vision and values whereas others pursue this goal
as one element of broader corporate branding strategies.
Corporate branding and employer branding
Hatch and Schulz (p. 142) argue that employment relationships should not be regarded as a
standalone brand. Rather, 'HR should focus on customizing its practices to align them with the corporate brand.'
The advocate a seamless relationship between employer and corporate branding with all branding efforts doing a
'double duty (that is, serving employees and building a strong brand).'
When employees have accepted the sincerity and accuracy of the employer brand they will carry it forward,
actively promoting the brand to colleagues and customers. But note those words: sincerity and accuracy.
Employer branding that is inherently untruthful will not work and is likely to be counter-productive.