Attracting and Keeping Top Employees is Still Difficult
September 15 2002 - The economy may be slowing but most
HR executives find attracting and retaining talent to be a
big problem, according to a new study from The Conference Board.
90% of the 109 surveyed executives say that they are finding it
difficult to attract and keep the best people for their organization.
Respondents cited corporate turmoil and limited career opportunities
as the key reasons for unwanted turnover. Noncompetitive pay and benefits
are also barriers.
"While labor shortages in the 1990s were driven by technology skills and
initiatives, employers are currently putting a high premium on general
leadership competency," says David Dell of The Conference Board, co-author of
the report with Jack Hickey, Research Consultant, The Conference
Board. "For this reason, the quest for top-flight talent has to be the job of
everyone within an organization from CEO to junior employee. Even with
unlimited funding and resources and the best intentions and programs, HR
cannot conquer a turnover problem alone. Success requires a corporate-wide
integrated recruitment and retention strategy that can respond quickly to
change."
"Most companies still take a shotgun approach to keeping employees happy,
and most still consider their efforts too reactive, especially in regard to
retention," says Hickey.
Behaviors that can drive away talent
Failure to make Talent Supply a Long-Term Strategic Priority.
New technology and tools are now available to address getting and keeping talent,
but if HR is not actively engaged in the planning process and does not receive
corporate commitment from the top, the supply of talented employees will almost
certainly be limited to ad hoc clusters of programs and boom and bust cycles of
hiring and reductions that waste talent and inevitably cost more.'
Not Making the Business Case on Turnover.
Senior managers are not likely to recognize and treat employee turnover as a problem
if they do not understand how it affects their business. HR executives need to
quantify relevant costs and benefits in clear, concrete terms.
Just Throw Money at the Problem.
Pay and benefits are not the only reasons why employees leave their jobs. But
companies frequently raise or sweeten the compensation package when valued employees
look like leaving = even when compensation is not ranked among the most important
staff turnover factors. This response is likely to be inadequate.
Organizational Denial. Employers should acknowledge that employees'
first loyalty is to themselves, followed by their craft or professional skills.
Companies have to be aware that people make decisions to leave or stay not
only on their career prospects with their current employers but also on how
it might prepare them to move on elsewhere.
Translating turnover into numbers that executives understand is not
only essential because they need to appreciate the true costs,
but also because they have the solutions within their spheres of control.
Individual managers control skills, behavior and job design
and are 'fairly inaccessible to HR's intervention.' But, although HR may take the lead
on attacking turnover, responsibility for their own turnover numbers and any
behaviors that may cause employees to leave the firm have to be delegated to line managers.
The HR executives surveyed cite five major objectives for their
staffing management activities:
* organizational stability;
* opportunities for career and personal development;
* multilevel involvement and accountability for talent;
* integrated talent strategies;
* emphasis on employer brand and reputation.
Keeping the best talent
Companies are increasingly using the Internet and
intranets/enterprise portals to manage part, at least, the recruitment and
retention process. Web-based HR systems have often become the key to broader
outreach strategies - they are especially cost-effective in accessing passive job
seekers, college students, and minorities.
E-recruiting is particularly efficient in cost and time, eliminating
expensive headhunters and agencies and may significantly reduce the duration of the
recruiting cycle. Speed matters with each day of delay in hiring meaning a loss of
potential revenue from a new employee. Online recruiting also vastly expands employers'
access to some of the most desirable segments of the talent market, even high-level
executives.'
E-recruiting gathers more candidate information and makes it easier and
cheaper to gather, track, organize, and store applicant data. It is especially valuable for highly competitive campus
recruiting, appealing to college students as leading-edge and dynamic.
Source: Sustaining The Talent Quest: Getting and Keeping the
Best People in Volatile Times, Report #1318-02-RR, The Conference Board.