Nissan employees reject UAW representation
October 3 2001 -
The UAW failed in its fourth campaign in 12 years to achieve representation rights at Nissan
North America's Smyrna plant. The National Labor Relations Board concluded the election
today with the official count sheet showing 3,103 votes to reject the
union, and 1,486 votes for union representation.
"The majority of our employees have made it clear that they have no
interest in being represented by the UAW," said Dan Gaudette, NNA senior vice
president of U.S. Manufacturing. "Most union elections become a contest
between the employees and the union. The contest has been a long and hard one
and it's been disruptive, but our employees have made their choice clear. We
hope now that the UAW will respect their wishes."
UAW President Stephen P. Yokich called today's loss at Nissan a "setback
for Nissan workers," and said, "the fact remains that in the global economy,
Nissan workers still need and deserve the seat at the decision-making table
that only a union can provide. That's why Nissan workers and other workers
can continue to count on the UAW's support in their efforts to unionize and
build brighter futures for themselves and their families."
"Obviously we're disappointed that the UAW supporters at Nissan came up
short in this election after working so hard and standing up to Nissan's
intense anti-union campaign," Yokich added. "Yet, at the same time, we're
proud of the courage and determination they displayed throughout."
"Make no mistake about it," he said, "this vote does not change the
constructive relationships we have with Ford, GM, DaimlerChrysler, NUMMI,
Mitsubishi and hundreds of other employers that contribute every day to
keeping our middle-class economy strong,"
Bob King, head of UAW's Organizing Department, commented, "our experience
tells us that campaigns like this exert tremendous pressure on employers to
maintain higher wages and better benefits for their workers than would otherwise
be the case. Whether they know it or not, every Nissan technician owes a debt
to the brave Nissan workers who campaign for the union. They are protecting
every Nissan worker's standard of living."
"There can be no doubt," added King, "that Nissan management's law
breaking and campaign of fear and intimidation offers dramatic proof of the
tremendous obstacles workers must overcome in the face of a hostile employer."
"Most people think that union elections are just like the votes American
citizens all know for elected officials and ballot propositions," King
continued. "Unfortunately, that is not the case. In this election and in far
too many union elections, employers threaten workers with loss of jobs, plant
closings, moving to Mexico, loss of wages and benefits, and many other
threats. Moreover, unlike political elections where all sides have comparable
access to the voters, in union elections, the employer has unlimited workplace
access to the workers while unions have no workplace access to workers."
"Nissan set the wrong tone for this campaign early on," said King, "when
plant manager Daniel Gaudette told workers in an in-plant video message that
they should not even talk to UAW supporters.
"The company also conducted
extensive illegal surveillance of Nissan workers who were engaged in
leafleting and other pro-union activities in and around the plant.
"Furthermore, Nissan workers who were perceived by the company as undecided
were forced to attend compulsory meetings, often repeatedly, where they were
barraged with distorted, misleading and just plain wrong information about the
UAW. Every Nissan technician was subjected on a daily basis to company
disinformation about everything from Nissan's relationship with unions in
other countries to the basics of Nissan benefits and company policies."