![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Personnel Management dates from the 1890's in the USA - Yes Personnel Management has more of a welfare than a managerialist tradition in some countries - Yes Traditional personnel managers had high status compared to managers in other business functions - No HRM is just a new name for Personnel Management wherever it is applied - No There is a greater stress on the differences between HRM and Personnel Management outside the USA - Yes Human Resource Management first evolved in Great Britain - No The ideas of F.W Taylor and Henry Forward have no influence on management today - No Human Resource Management is a systematic approach to people management - Yes The fundamental concepts of HRM are generally agreed and easy to implement - No Basically, HRM is just Human Relations - No HRM is one of a number of management fashions that have developed over the last few decades - Yes The rise of HRM has something to do with female and male power issues - Yes Hard and soft mean difficult and easy to understand respectively - No Harvard's model of HRM is much harder than that from Michigan - No HRM sometimes seems to mean Hypocrisy, Rhetoric and Manipulation - Yes Human resources are just the same as any other business resource - No The rise and application of HRM has been faster in theory than in practice - Yes Human Resource Information Systems and other computer techniques make HRM easier to apply - Yes Currently there is considerable interest in measuring and evaluating the effectiveness of HR initiatives - Yes There is a coherent and integrated system of HR certification in the USA - No
|
HRM
Guide
.net
Human Resources |
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Copyright © 1997-2007 Alan Price and HRM Guide contributors contributors. All rights reserved. |